RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01001 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded decorations recognizing his service in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While assigned at Clark AB, Philippines, he went on temporary duty (TDY) tours to various bases throughout Vietnam and believes he qualifies for the requested decorations. In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal statement. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s master personnel record (MPR) was misplaced before an advisory was prepared. All efforts to date to locate the missing record have been unsuccessful. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, noting, in part, based on the available evidence, they were not able to confirm the applicant served in Vietnam. They requested the applicant provide additional information to show proof that he served in Vietnam; however, in his response he did not submit any additional information. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained the circumstances as to why he was not able to provide additional evidence to support his appeal. While he realizes now, the importance of recordkeeping; he does not have the required documentation, since it’s been over 40 years. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Should the applicant provide additional documentation to substantiate his claim, we would be inclined to reconsider his petition. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01001 in Executive Session on 29 April 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01001 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 09, w/atch. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 12 Mar 10. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Mar 10. Chair